Growth has been driven by emerging destinations in Asia, the Pacific, Africa, and the Middle East, increasing the risk of travel-associated diseases.1 Different approaches for risk estimation and/or risk characterization in travel medicine may
be used, including the use of notification data, case series and chart reports, cohort surveys, airport surveys, and data collected by sentinel surveillance networks for travelers.2 We propose here a combination of two methods to investigate travel-associated illnesses in travelers. We conducted a prospective cohort follow-up in travelers recruited at a pre-travel visit in one buy Doramapimod travel clinic in Marseille and compared the results to data on ill travelers who presented in two sentinel surveillance clinics in Marseille. Travel characteristics, specific health behaviors, and compliance with preventive measures were also assessed as probable risk factors. Senegal was elected as the travel destination in this study because it is a very popular destination for tourists, with around 900,000 foreign visitors per year (http://www.afrik.com/article15065.html).
Senegal is the most popular destination in sub-Saharan Africa for French travelers,3 and little data about travel-associated diseases in French buy MG-132 citizens returning from Senegal are available in the published literature.4–9 All patients aged >18 years, who were seeking pre-travel advice at the Marseille Travel Medicine Centre (Tropical and Infectious Disease Ward, University Hospital, Hôpital Nord) before traveling to Senegal
for less than 3 months, were prospectively screened for inclusion between January and December 2008. Overall, 6,000 travelers seek pre-travel advice at the Travel Medicine Center each year. A verbal questionnaire was administered on each individual by a physician addressing baseline demographics, socioeconomic status, and travel characteristics. Questionnaires were pilot tested among travelers at the Marseille Travel Medicine Centre. Because the evaluation of travel-associated sunburn occurrence was one of the objectives of the study, the phototype of individuals was assessed during the pre-travel encounter by observing skin appearance and assessing sunburn and tanning history according to the Dynein Fitzpatrick classification.10 Briefly, phototype I burns easily and never tans; II burns easily and tans minimally with difficulty; III burns moderately and uniformly; IV burns minimally and tans moderately and easily; V rarely burns and tans profusely; and VI never burns but tans profusely. During the consultation, each individual was provided with extensive scripted advice about major travel-associated risks (arthropod bites, food and drinking water-related risk, sun exposure, environmental hazard, and animal-related injuries) and related preventive measures.