rev. comb. nov.; X. campestris pv. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Dye 1978 as X. smithii subsp. selleck chemicals smithii nov. comb. nov. nom. nov.; X. campestris pv. alfalfae (ex Riker and Jones, 1935) Dye 1978 as X. alfalfae subsp. alfalfae (ex Riker et al., 1935) sp. nov. nom. rev.; and “”var. fuscans”" of X. campestris pv. phaseoli (ex. Smith, 1987) Dye 1978 as X. fuscans subsp. fuscans sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2005, 28:494–518.PubMedCrossRef 27. Schaad NW, Postnikova E, Lacy GH, et al.: Emended classification of xanthomonad pathogens on citrus. Syst Appl Microbiol 2006, 29:690–695.PubMedCrossRef 28. Ah-You N, Gagnevin L, Chiroleu F, et al.: Pathological variations within Xanthomonas campestris

pv. selleck compound mangiferaeindicae support its separation into three distinct pathovars that can be distinguished by Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism. Phytopathology 2007, 97:1568–1577.PubMedCrossRef 29. Fargier E, Manceau C: Pathogenicity assays restrict the species Xanthomonas NVP-LDE225 nmr campestris into three pathovars and reveal nine races within X. campestris pv. campestris . Plant Pathol 2007, 56:805–818.CrossRef 30. Jones JB, Lacy GH, Bouzar H, Stall RE, Schaad NW: Reclassification of the xanthomonads associated with bacterial spot disease of tomato and pepper. Syst Appl Microbiol 2004, 27:755–762.PubMedCrossRef 31. Young JM, Park D-S, Shearman HM, Fargier E: A multilocus sequence analysis of the genus

Xanthomonas . Syst Appl Microbiol 2008, 31:366–377.PubMedCrossRef 32. Gonçalves ER, Rosato YB: Phylogenetic analysis of Xanthomonas species based upon 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002, 52:355–361.PubMed 33. Hauben L, Vauterin L, Swings J, Moore ER: Comparison of 16S ribosomal DNA sequences of all Xanthomonas species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997, 47:328–335.PubMedCrossRef 34. Moore ER, Krüger AS, Hauben L,

et al.: 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses and inter- and intrageneric relationships of Xanthomonas species and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia . FEMS Microbiol Lett 1997, 151:145–153.PubMedCrossRef 35. Parkinson NM, Cowie C, Heeney J, Stead DE: Phylogenetic structure of Xanthomonas determined by comparison of gyrB sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009, 59:264–274.PubMedCrossRef 36. Deloger M, El Karoui M, Petit M-A: A genomic distance based on MUM indicates discontinuity between most bacterial species and genera. J Bacteriol Endonuclease 2009, 191:91–99.PubMedCrossRef 37. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R: Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:19126–19131.PubMedCrossRef 38. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM: Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:2567–2572.PubMedCrossRef 39. Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB: Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 2003, 425:798–804.PubMedCrossRef 40. Philippe H, Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Lartillot N: Phylogenomics.