2A) Localization of pro-IL-16 in both the cytoplasm and nucleus

2A). Localization of pro-IL-16 in both the cytoplasm and nucleus was confirmed by confocal laser scanning microscopy; pro-IL-16 was present in both the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments of B cells (Fig. 2B-b). In addition, a substantial amount of pro-IL-16 co-localized with MHC class II molecules on the cell surface (Fig. 2B-d). These results suggest that pro-IL-16 is associated with MHC class II molecules Erlotinib either directly or indirectly in resting B cells and that translocation of pro-IL-16 into the nucleus is increased by negative signalling through MHC class II molecules. The increase in nuclear translocation

of pro-IL-16 after negative signalling suggested that pro-IL-16 may exert a negative effect on resting B cell activation. To directly test the role of pro-IL-16 in the suppression of resting B cell activation, we transfected pro-IL-16 cDNA into cells and determined the effect of pro-IL-16 overexpression on resting B cell activation (Fig. 3). After selection of positive www.selleckchem.com/products/ABT-263.html transfectants after a 2-week culture in selection medium, the expression of the transfected pro-IL-16 gene was confirmed through RT-PCR (data not shown) and Western blot analysis (Fig. 3B). Then, levels of cell proliferation and NF-κB activation were compared between the pro-IL-16 and vector control transfectants (Fig. 3A).

The proliferation of cells transfected with pro-IL-16 gene was significantly suppressed

(about 40%, P < 0.001) compared to that of vector control transfectant cells that grew normally (Fig. 3A). When we assessed the effect of pro-IL-16 gene transfection on activation of NF-κB subfamilies by Western blot analysis, we found that the translocation of NF-κB1 (p50), NF-κB2 (p52) and c-Rel of NF-κB subfamilies next into the nucleus, and the levels of these subfamilies in nuclear extracts were reduced by pro-IL-16 gene transfection (Fig. 3B). LPS treatment did not change the suppressive effect of pro-IL-16 on nuclear translocation of the p50, p52 and c-Rel NF-κB subfamilies (Fig. 3B). The finding that activation of NF-κB subfamilies (p50, p52 and c-Rel) is influenced by pro-IL-16 is consistent with our previous observations that MHC class II-mediated negative signalling in resting B cell activation is closely associated with the activation of p50, p52 and c-Rel NF-κB subfamilies [16, 17]. Collectively, these results suggest that B cell proliferation induced by NF-κB activation is significantly impaired by the overexpression of pro-IL-16. To confirm the negative role of pro-IL-16 in resting B cell proliferation, siRNA for pro-IL-16 was introduced into 38B9 cells as described in the materials and methods section. Initially, knock-down of target pro-IL-16 gene expression by siRNA transfection was confirmed at 40 h after transfection through Western blot analysis and RT-PCR (Fig. 4A).

Comments are closed.