33, p < .01; t (28) = −3.77, p < .01; t (28) = −2.34, p < .05; t (28) = −2.9, p < .05 for zero, 250 msec, 450 msec and 850 msec respectively]. Whereas in the low-load task although zero and 250 ms did differ [t (28) = −2.39, p < .05; t (28) = −2.13, p < .05 respectively] there was no longer a significant loss of accuracy for the older group at 450 msec [t (28) = −1.84, ns] and 850 msec [t (28) = −.33, n.s.]. An ANOVA on SOA (4 levels) and load (2 levels) revealed highly significant main

effects of both SOA [F (3, 28) = 19.83, p < .0001] and load [F (1, 30) = 22.73, p < .0001] and a significant interaction between the two [F (3, 28) = 4.14, p < .01]. Paired samples t-tests Sunitinib order further investigated the source of this interaction. In the low load task the discrimination performance of older participants did not significantly differ between the three Y-27632 SOAs [all t (20)< 1, n.s.]. Whereas during the high load task, performance was equivalent at 250 and 450 msec [t (20) = −1.34, n.s.], but at 850 msec it

was significantly better than at either of the two other delays [t (20) = −3.17, p < .01 and t (20) = −2.42, p < .05 for 250 msec and 450 msec respectively]. The results described here provide new evidence that perception of older individuals is strongly impaired when they are required to pay attention to a task at fixation. Compared to younger participants, those in the older group were far less accurate in discriminating peripheral letters not only when presented simultaneously with the central diamonds but for a delay period afterwards. This is the first evidence of a “spatiotemporal” attentional blink across the visual field modulated by the demand of a primary task at fixation in older healthy participants. The experiments presented here reveal the spatial and temporal consequences to the effective filipin visual field of an attention-demanding task at fixation. Experiment 1 demonstrated that patients with right hemisphere damage, but without visuospatial neglect, were severely impaired in discriminating letters

even near to fixation whilst maintaining a high level of accuracy for the primary task. Spatially, this impacted on perception on the contralesional side. Temporally, this impact lasted well beyond the presentation of central stimuli. Experiment 2 modified the difficulty of the task in order to investigate the effect of healthy ageing on these perceptual effects. This study revealed a significant impairment in older participants, compared to a younger group, in detecting peripheral letters when attention demands to perform the central task was high. Again, this impairment was for items near to fixation and lasted for a lag period after central task presentation. Crucially this was not the case for younger participants.