59 Optimizing indoor lighting conditions Despite the multitude of studies SB216763 datasheet investigating light effects on humans, it is still unclear how much light is needed during daytime to stay fully entrained to the environmental light-dark cycle. This becomes an important topic in our round-the-clock society, since the time we spend outside during the day progressively decreases, whereas the time we spend with light-emitting Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical devices during the night increases. Another factor is the substantial interindividual difference in light requirements by the circadian system

to stay synchronized with the external 24-hour rhythm, for example between extreme morning or evening types (“larks” and “owls”). The definition of extreme chronotypes is based on subjective preferences for very early (morning type) or very late

(evening type) habitual sleep and wake (times), which usually differ by 2 to 4 hours.60 Both chronotypes are usually obliged to follow similar scheduled work hours in spite of being at different endogenous Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical circadian Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical phases,60 and thus, respond differently to the daytime light exposure, which has to be considered when designing indoor lighting conditions. Conclusion Chronobiological knowledge of how light affects human behaviour has begun to be implemented at work places,24 in schools,61 and in clinical environments (such as residential care homes for the elderly, and intensive care and neonatal units24,51). There is still much work to do: to test, predict and apply optimal lighting conditions for different populations and patients, in terms of spectral composition, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical light intensity, and dynamics. Also, geographical latitude, building exposure, and building properties play an important role. Only synergistic Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical interdisciplinary work between (neuro-) scientists, physicians, architects, and engineers will allow us to better assess and optimize lighting conditions, and to foster the translation into practical applications. Acknowledgments Dr M. Münch is supported by the Velux Foundation (Switzerland), and Dr V. Bromundt by the AXA Research Fund.
Computation in the cerebral

cortex of all mammals has two essential features: local-global communication and persistent activity.1-3 Due to the bidirectional and highly branched Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase connectivity of neurons throughout the mammalian brain, the results of local computations are broadcast to widespread areas so that multiple structures are informed simultaneously around any given local activity. The inverse is also true: local circuits are under the continuous control of global brain activity, usually referred to by terms such as “brain state,” “top-down” or “attentional” control.4,5 The second fundamental feature of the cerebral cortex is its persistent activity, ie, an ability to ignite and maintain a long-lasting trace after the initial input has already vanished.