aureus cells. Biological approaches have great potential in alleviating microbial attachments. Microbial species coexist and interact extensively with each other in natural biofilms. The competition for substrates serves as one of the major evolutionary driving forces in these multiple-species biofilms (Xavier & Foster, 2007; Xavier et al., 2009). Thus, many bacteria are capable of synthesizing and excreting chemicals that inhibit biofilm formation by other species.

For example, biosurfactants are synthesized selleck products and excreted by many bacteria, which inhibit attachment by their competitors (Zeraik & Nitschke, 2010; Luna et al., 2011). Thus, biosurfactants producing probiotic bacteria are proposed as potential biofilm control agents (Rodrigues et al., 2004; Falagas & Makris, 2009). Biological buy Cisplatin approaches for controlling biofilms are well studied in dental plaque biofilms. The oral microbial flora contains many beneficial species that are able to halt the progression of oral disease. Probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus was shown to reduce the biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans,

one of primary dental cariogen, through inhibiting attachment (Tahmourespour & Kermanshahi, 2011). The early dental plaque colonizer Streptococcus gordonii secretes proteases that reduce subsequent colonization of S. mutans by inactivating its competence-stimulating peptide signalling system (Wang et al., 2010). In a recent study, Ogawa et al. (2011) identified exo-beta-d-fructosidase from the culture supernatants of Streptococcus salivarius as an active substance to inhibit S. mutans biofilm formation (Ogawa et al., 2011). Young biofilms are often more susceptible to antimicrobial agents than mature biofilms (Drenkard & Ausubel, 2002; Mukherjee et al., 2003; Allesen-Holm et al., 2006; Ito et al., 2009). The large amounts of EPS in the mature biofilms can act as a diffusion barrier to antimicrobial agents (Hoyle et al., 1992; Souli & Giamarellou, 1998; Anderl et al., 2000). The high cell density in the mature biofilms can induce cell-to-cell communication

PIK3C2G (quorum sensing) systems, which up-regulate expression of genes contributing to antibiotic resistance (De Kievit et al., 2001; Bjarnsholt et al., 2005) and release of protecting DNA (Hunt et al., 1995; Allesen-Holm et al., 2006). Also, competition for nutrients can lead to subpopulation differentiation and spatial physiological heterogeneity in the mature biofilms, which further cause antibiotic resistance (Xu et al., 1998; Walters et al., 2003). Thus, strategies for interfering structure development and differentiation of biofilms are being developed by many research groups. Enzymatically and chemically disrupting biofilm EPS matrix is proved to be an efficient approach to arrest biofilm structure development. Longhi et al.