Based on previous evidence (Chamorro-Premuzic and Furnham, 2008 and Chamorro-Premuzic and Furnham, 2009), we hypothesized that (1) surface learning is negatively associated with Openness and TIE but positively with Neuroticism; (2) deep learning is positively related to Extraversion, Openness, see more TIE and Conscientiousness, and negatively to Neuroticism; (3) achieving learning is positively associated with Extraversion and Conscientiousness and not meaningfully with Openness or TIE; (4) Agreeableness and intelligence are unrelated to learning approaches; (5) and personality traits and ability account for the majority of variance in learning approaches.
Data of 707 undergraduate psychology and computer science students was available, collected from seven UK universities1 over the time span of 2 years.
Not all students completed all measures and data were missing at random. Cases without intelligence test score were omitted, resulting in a final sample of N = 579 (330 females). Age ranged from 17 to 41 years (M = 19; SD = 1.63). This 42-item questionnaire assesses three learning motives, i.e. why students learn, as well as three learning strategies, i.e. how students learn. These are divided into surface (a reproduction of what is taught to meet the minimum requirement), deep (a real understanding of what is learned), and achieving learning (aiming to maximize the grade). Thus there are six subscales (surface motive, surface strategy, deep motive, deep strategy, achieving find more motive, and achieving strategy) with seven items each. The measure has good re-test reliability (Fox, McManus, & Winder, 2001). Example items are “I test myself on important topics until I understand them completely”. for deep learning; “I generally restrict my study to what is specifically set as I think it is unnecessary to do anything extra”. for surface learning; and “I believe that society is based on competition and schools and universities should reflect this”. for achieving
learning. This is a 60-item, untimed, self-report inventory, which assesses the five broad personality traits: Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. Trait scales Selleckchem Lonafarnib have internal consistencies between .68 and .86 (Costa & McCrae, 1992). TIE is a 59-item, self-report inventory that requires participants to rate on a six-point Likert-type scale the extent to which they seek, engage in, and enjoy, intellectual activities. Internal consistencies are around .85 (e.g. Goff and Ackerman, 1992 and von Stumm et al., 2011). This 50-item intelligence-test is administered in 12 min. Scores can range from 0 to 50. Items include word and number comparisons, disarranged sentences, serial analysis of geometric figures, and mathematical and logical problems. The test correlates at r = .92 with the WAIS-R ( Wechsler, 1981 and Wonderlic, 1992).