elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). This article has been retracted at the request of the first Epigenetics inhibitor author, who accepts responsibility. Following an internal review committee at UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, evidence has been found of improper duplication in Fig. 1 of this article. “
“Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is

the most rapidly growing lung cancer subtype and patient prognosis is extremely poor [1]. Although most SCLC patients respond to initial treatment, long-term survival is low. Unfortunately, disease progression or relapse occurs in almost all advanced-stage SCLC patients and in the majority of early-stage SCLC patients [2], [3], [4], [5] and [6]. Response to subsequent chemotherapy depends on responsiveness to previous induction chemotherapy and the interval between cessation of initial therapy and disease progression [7] and [8]. Overall response rates (ORRs) of 21–38% and median overall survival (OS) of 6.9–11.7 months were reported in chemotherapy-sensitive SCLC patients after treatment with topotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor [8] and [9]. A previous randomized study find more demonstrated similar efficacy and improved tolerability of topotecan compared with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine [10]. Topotecan is also considered as a treatment option for chemotherapy-refractory

SCLC; however, low ORRs (0–11%) and OS (median, 4.7–5.4 months) have been reported [8], [9] and [11]. Thus, a standard chemotherapy for the treatment of refractory SCLC has not yet been established. However, effective treatment must be developed to improve prognosis for Docetaxel datasheet SCLC patients. Amrubicin (AMR), a fully synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline, is metabolized in the body to the active metabolite amrubicinol, which has higher antitumor activity than AMR. Both AMR and amrubicinol, which are topoisomerase II inhibitors, exhibit antitumor activities against various human tumors

in xenograft models and have shown no risk of typical anthracycline cardiotoxicity [12]. In subgroup analyses of small phase II studies, AMR showed promising activity in patients with refractory SCLC with ORR of 17–50% and median OS of 5.3–10.3 months [9] and [13]. Accordingly, the results of previous studies indicated that AMR may be useful for treating refractory SCLC. Therefore, we conducted this study to confirm the efficacy and safety of AMR, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, for treating refractory SCLC. A phase III trial was preferred to evaluate the effectiveness of AMR therapy; however, other than AMR therapy, there was no promising treatment under development for refractory SCLC at that time. As second-best evidence that was not from a randomized controlled trial, we designed a nonrandomized single-arm confirmatory study to evaluate whether AMR therapy can be considered as a standard treatment for refractory SCLC.