Hartog calls this regime of historicity “presentism” and defines it as an invasion of the present into the realms of the past and future. For instance, Hartog notes that the conception of the past as a bygone time has recently been replaced by that of memory, which revitalizes in the present what would hitherto have been considered as dead or obsolete. Memory thus

appears as a “presentist Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical instrument,” allowing for a “presentist use of the past.” Hartog also points to the importance given recently to the notion of heritage, which makes traces of the past necessary components of current individual and collective identities. As for the extension of the present into the future, the historian notes that our societies conceive of the time to come as a source of uncertainty and anguish. Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical The future must be prepared now, in the present, in order to prevent potential environmental, political, health, and other catastrophes from occurring. According to Hartog, this is evident in the emergence of the principle of responsibility and the precautionary principle, which

state, respectively, that the living are responsible for handing over to future generations a world in which Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical life will be decent, and that an action should not be Selleck Idarubicin undertaken if it is deemed to have serious potential consequences, notably in the long run. For the French historian, presentism differs significantly from previous temporal orders, namely futurism, eschatologism, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and pastism (mentioned here in reverse chronological order). Futurism, which Hartog dates roughly between the French revolution (1789) and the fall of the Berlin Wall (1989), emphasized the present as a step toward the Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical future; time was seen as a movement of uninterrupted improvement, with an ever-increasing efficiency of technologies and a continuous economic growth. It was an era marked by the idea

of progress and an orientation toward the future. Before the advent of futurism, eschatologism was the dominant temporal order, according to Hartog. It envisaged time above all as a process of salvation. In his theory, the resurrection of Christ marks the beginning of the process—being a fixed, past event, it acts as one of the delimitations of time—which needs to be completed, and this supposedly occurs through the second coming of Christ (parousia), or Judgement Day—representing the other delimitation SPTLC1 of time. In this regime of historicity, the present acts as an in-between stage; it is simultaneously a time of reminiscence about salvation and a time for the expectation of eternal life. “Past, present and future are articulated on the backdrop of eternity,” as Hartog writes (p 75). Finally, pastism, which the historian dates back to ancient times, conceived of the present as the reverberation of a mythical past.