Parent response to data collection was more limited, but the one parent who reported significant anxiety and depression

symptoms at pretreatment also reported significant change by posttreatment. These findings provide very preliminary support for improvement in anxiety and mood symptoms, and in functional impairment associated with bullying. Attendance records and satisfaction ratings suggested that the group was both feasible and acceptable. Group attendance was strong (M = 13.2 sessions, SD = .45), with four of the five members missing one group session and one youth Ipilimumab in vivo attending all 14 sessions. Satisfaction ratings suggested the group was well received by participating youth. Out of a possible range of 0–3, the see more mean GSQ score was 1.79 (SD = .89), indicating

a mean rating approximately equating to “good.” The overall feedback was generally positive, although several group members reported important concerns and suggestions. When asked what they liked about the program, group members reported: “We talked about problems similar to mine,” “How we would do role plays to solve our problems,” and “I liked my group members, they were helpful along with group leaders.” One group member stated that he learned how to better cope with anger, while another member reported learning “new ways to deal with things.” In terms of what group members disliked, one member reported disliking fellow group members, another described frustration with the group having to stop to address problematic behaviors, and another disliked missing class. When asked what they would change about

the group, group members suggested adding more role plays and making the activities more fun and active. Overall, three of the five youth rated the overall quality of the group as “good” or “excellent,” while two others rated it as “fair. Youth 1 was a 13-year-old, multiracial (Hispanic and White) Megestrol Acetate seventh-grade boy, living with both parents and one sibling. The father (graduate equivalency diploma) worked as a skilled laborer and his mother (college graduate) worked in industry, earning an annual $100,000–$150,000. Youth 1 had an individualized education plan to help manage an auditory processing disorder. At pretreatment, Youth 1 was diagnosed with SAD and reported that he did not have many friends. He reported that he was involved in several incidents of bullying in which a group of his peers teased him for being short, spread rumors about him, and called him names such as “Goody Two Shoes” and “Baby.” Youth 1 reported that bullying negatively impacted his mood, relationships with friends and family, and school performance. During group, Youth 1 was often quiet, but participated when prompted by one of the co-leaders.