The most obvious AG-014699 solubility dmso and indeed that which was first suggested by Crutzen (2002) is the rise in Global temperatures caused by greenhouse gas emissions which have resulted from industrialisation. The Mid Holocene rise in greenhouse gases, particularly CH4 ascribed to

human rice-agriculture by Ruddiman (2003) although apparently supportable on archaeological grounds ( Fuller et al., 2011), is also explainable by enhanced emissions in the southern hemisphere tropics linked to precession-induced modification of seasonal precipitation ( Singarayer et al., 2011). The use of the rise in mean Global temperatures has two major advantages, firstly it is a Global measure and secondly it is recorded in components of the Earth system from ice to lake sediments and even in oceanic sediments through acidification. In both respects it is far preferable Rapamycin to an indirect non-Earth systems parameter such as population growth or some arbitrary date ( Gale and Hoare, 2012) for some phase of the industrial revolution, which was itself diachronous. The second, pragmatic alternative has been to use the radiocarbon baseline set by nuclear weapon emissions at 1950 as a Global Stratigraphic Stage Age (GSSA) and after which even the most remote lakes

show an anthropogenic influence ( Wolfe et al., 2013). However, as shown by the data in this paper this could depart from the date of the most significant terrestrial stratigraphic signals by as much as 5000 years. It would also, if defined as an Epoch boundary, mark the end of the Holocene which is itself partly defined on the rise of human societies and clearly contains significant and in some cases overwhelming human impact on geomorphological

systems. Since these contradictions are not mutually resolvable one area of current consideration is to consider a boundary outside of or above normal geological boundaries. It can be argued that this is both in the spirit, if not the language, Docetaxel in vivo of the original suggestion by Crutzen and is warranted by the fact that this situation is unique in Earth history, indeed in the history of our solar system. It is also non-repeatable in that a shift to human dominance of the Earth System can only happen once. We can also examine the question using the same reasoning that we apply to geological history. If after the end of the Pleistocene, as demarcated by the loss of all ice on the poles (either due to human-induced warming or plate motions), we were to look back at the Late Pleistocene record would we see a litho- and biostratigraphic discontinuity dated to the Mid to Late Holocene? Geomorphology is a fundamental driver of the geological record at all spatial and temporal scales. It should therefore be part of discussions concerning the identification and demarcation of the Holocene (Brown et al., 2013) including sub-division on the basis of stratigraphy in order to create the Anthropocene (Zalasiewicz et al., 2011).