This can result in relatively large errors in this direction, which accounts for the outliers in the histogram. Ultimately, the importance of needle reconstruction accuracy lies in the effect on the dose delivered to the target and the OARs. A
number of dosimetric parameters were used to evaluate this and these are summarized in Table 1. The target doses in the US-based plan generally show only small differences relative to those determined based on the CT needle reconstruction. The doses to the OARs, however, showed some larger changes. These can be attributed almost entirely to the systematic error in the radial direction. In the optimized dose distributions, the isodose line corresponding to the maximum allowed urethral dose generally conforms very closely to the urethral structure. These dose distributions were, Trametinib chemical structure however, determined based on incorrect needle positions. When the distributions are transferred to the CT-determined
needle positions, which represent the dose that would be delivered, the distributions are shifted, Epacadostat chemical structure moving the high-dose region into the urethra. This is illustrated in Fig. 7, where Fig. 7a shows the dose planned on the basis of the US images, and Fig. 7b shows the dose that would be delivered based on the CT images. The largest change in the urethral maximum dose was an increase of 10%, with the average change being 3.8% of the prescribed dose. The changes in the doses to the rectum are negative in all cases, meaning the rectal dose is lower than the dose predicted by the US reconstruction. In this case, correcting for the systematic error
in the radial direction moves the dose cloud away from the rectum. Until the recent introduction of TRUS-based planning for prostate HDR-BT, the major drawback of this modality has been the need for Obeticholic Acid a multistep procedure involving: 1. TRUS-guided needle insertion under anesthesia in the dorsal lithotomy position The multistep nature of CT-planned prostate HDR-BT prolongs the process; limits the number of cases that can be done in a day; adds discomfort and inconvenience for the patient; and, most importantly, introduces an unacceptable source of error owing to needle retraction in the caudal direction away from the base of the prostate. Mean displacements have been reported of 3–11 mm with a range up to 28 mm [1], [2], [3], [6], [7] and [8]. It is felt that any displacement greater than 3 mm should be corrected (3). Inaccuracies are inherent in the readjustment of the depth of insertion several hours postimplantation with the patient awake [1], [3], [4], [5] and [6]. TRUS-based planning allows both the procedure and treatment to be performed in a single location and under anesthesia, eliminating both the risk of needle displacement during patient transfer, and associated patient discomfort while being transferred and repositioned with the needles in place.