Figure 8 In silico analysis of EupR and its putative cognate histidine kinase. (A) EupR is a two-component response regulator of the NarL/FixJ family of proteins. Neighbor-Joining tree based on proteins CHIR98014 datasheet with a common LuxR_C-like conserved domain. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those
of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. All positions containing alignment gaps and missing data were eliminated only in pairwise sequence comparisons. Bootstrap probabilities (as percentage) were determined from 1000 resamplings. Domain architecture of each group is represented at the side of the tree. The figure is based on the graphical output of the SMART web interface at http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de, with modifications. Sizes and positions of conserved domains
are indicated by the labeled symbols. (B) Domain architecture of the EupR cognate histidine kinase. The figure is based on the graphical buy ACY-1215 output of the SMART web interface at http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de, with modifications. Positions of conserved domains are indicated by symbols. Identification and analysis of the sensor histidine kinase putatively associated to EupR The classical two-component regulatory systems require a response regulator protein and a sensor protein, usually a membrane-bound sensor histidine protein kinase [16]. To identify the cognate histidine kinase of EupR, we used the the online application STRING 8.2 (http://string.embl.de/; [38]), a database and web resource dedicated to predict protein-protein interactions including both physical and functional interactions. STRING uses prediction algorithms based on data of neighborhood, gene fusion and co-occurrence
across genomes, among others. A total of 21 histidine protein kinases and 29 response regulators are included in the genome of C. salexigens (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Complete_Genomes/SignalCensus.html) but only the protein encoded by Csal869, located selleckchem three genes downstream EupR (see Figure 5), was connected with EupR by STRING with a high confidence score (0.772, composed of a neighborhood score of 0.193 and a co-occurrence across genomes score of 0.736). Predictions based on STRING algorithms do not have the specificity of experimental data, but have SAHA price enough statistical robustness as to be considered reliable [38]. To make a deeper functional in silico analysis of this signal transduction protein, we first compared it against several domain databases (see Methods). As Figure 8b shows, we found five distinct domains in the protein: two N-terminal “”input”" or sensor domains (SSF and PAS-PAC), a transmitter C-terminal region with a His-containing phosphoaceptor HiskA domain and an ATP-binding HATPase domain, and a C-terminal signal receiver domain (REC). The key residues (active site) were conserved in HiskA, HATPase and REC domains.