“
“Introduction The glutamatergic system is an attractive molecular target for pharmacological intervention (Kaczor and Matosiuk, 2010). Ligands acting on ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs: NMDA, AMPA, and kainate receptors) or

metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are potential drug high throughput screening assay candidates for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease), epilepsy, as well as schizophrenia, anxiety, and memory disorders (Kew and Kemp, 2005). Although only a few glutamate receptor ligands have turned out to be clinically useful (firstly, because of the crucial role of the glutamatergic system in many physiological processes, and secondly, due to the unfavorable psychotropic side effects, traditionally linked with high-affinity NMDA receptor antagonists), ligands of kainate receptors seem to be especially promising. Kainate receptors are involved Selleckchem MK 8931 in epileptogenesis and inducing synaptic plasticity, mainly via the mossy fiber long-term potentiation mechanism. Thus, antagonists of kainate receptors are potential anti-seizure and neuroprotective agents. Moreover, non-competitive antagonists of AMPA receptors are well tolerated in preclinical and clinical studies (Szénási et al., 2008),

thus it may be expected that this will also be the case for such ligands of kainate see more receptors. Research on non-competitive antagonists Low-density-lipoprotein receptor kinase of kainate receptors is hindered by the fact that only three series of such compounds have been obtained up to now (Kaczor et al., 2012; Valgeirsson et al., 2003, 2004). Recently, we have reported 1,2,3,5-tetrasubstituted

indole derivatives which are among the most active non-competitive antagonists of the GluK1 receptor and are the first known such ligands of the GluK2 receptor, Fig. 1 (Kaczor et al., 2012). We have also suggested a binding site for them in the receptor transduction domain (Kaczor et al., 2014) which was enabled by the construction of whole receptor models (Kaczor et al., 2008, 2009, 2014). Here we present further modifications, 2–7, of the lead compound E099-25011, (1-ethyl-5-methoxy-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methylindole), 1. The lead compound was identified by searching the internal databases of compounds at the Elbion Institute, Radebul, Germany. 1 is an analog of Zindoxifene, an anti-estrogen, tumor-inhibiting compound (Schneider et al., 1991). We have previously optimized compound 1 by changing substituents in positions 1, 2, 3, and 5 of the indole system (Fig. 1) (Kaczor et al., 2012, 2014). Compounds 3 and 5–7 were tested for their affinity to the GluK2 receptor, and compounds 3 and 5 were found to be non-competitive antagonists at this receptor. Furthermore, we show how novel non-competitive antagonists 3 and 5 of the GluK2 receptor interact with the transduction domain of the previously constructed homology model of this receptor (Kaczor et al., 2014). Fig.