The following marker panels usually aid in distinguishing the common type EMA from cervical adenocarcinoma by their opposite immunostaining tendencies to each other: p16, ER, PgR, vimentin and CEA.[44, 45] Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection status positively detected by in situ hybridization is considered
as a significant evidence supporting the cervical origin.[44, 45] But, as for challenging cases with cervical adenocarcinoma mimicking primary EMA, which is characterized by prominent endometrial or endomyometrial involvement, HPV detection by in situ hybridization and immunostaining for ER and PgR are also expected to lead to confirmation of the cervical
origin.[44] RGFP966 cell line Some endometrial carcinomas are known to arise around the lower segment of the uterine body.[46-51] These tumors are designated as Romidepsin so-called uterine ‘isthmus cancer’, and it recently has drawn attention in association with Lynch syndrome.[52] According to the reports on isthmus cancer from Japan, the patients are younger and their histological type is predominantly a common type EMA.[46, 47] However, the patient profiles are different from those described in overseas reports,[52] especially in that a considerable amount of non-EMA are included. Immunohistochemically, isthmus cancer tends to be a hybrid entity between cervical adenocarcinoma and EMA, reflected by the expression attitudes of ER, PgR, vimentin, CEA and p16.[49, 52, 53] Interestingly, even though it is rare, this type of cancer has been demonstrated to be infected with HPV.[47, 48] This evidence is consistent with the
suggestion that the isthmus cancer is divided into the endometrial and endocervical types. When simultaneous cancers involving the endometrium and the ovary are encountered, the following three diagnostic interpretations are represented: (i) endometrial origin with ovarian metastasis; (ii) ovarian origin with endometrial metastasis; and (iii) independent primary cancers. The distinction among them is of clinicopathologic Nintedanib order importance in the determination of stage, which is essential for the selection of therapeutic regimens and prediction of the outcome. If both of the endometrial and ovarian cancers are the common type EMA, the prognosis is favorable. Therefore, the evidence supports the implication that they arise independently.[54] According to the one proposal, when there is multilocular ovarian involvement or at least two of the following criteria are filled, the tumors could be of endometrial origin with ovarian metastasis: (i) small (<5 cm) ovary; (ii) bilateral ovarian involvements; (iii) deep myometrial invasion; (iv) vascular invasion; and (v) fallopian tube involvement.