Participants of this study depended on their family members or friends to guide the decision of their own participation which is consistent with the dependency issues mentioned by Shah in his Meta-analysis of Qualitative studies. In our study, all NTPs and few TPs were unaware of the term inform consent. selleck products Similar result was reported by the focus groups conducted with 33 African American adult patients where the results revealed that few participants had understood concept of informed consent. In the same study and the studies reported in Briton[3,4] the patients had expressed distrust with the medical community. Also participants expressed fear that the doctors could and would make statements to persuade people to participate in the research.
[2,3] In our study distrust was expressed only with the Pharma companies. The results of our study offered us a chance to compare the levels of awareness of trial and non-trial participants using trial participants as a control. Our findings require validation in a larger sample that includes other geographical areas in the country. The findings generated from these interviews will then be used to develop the questionnaire for evaluating public and the patient’s perception, Knowledge, attitudes and behaviour regarding CT participation in the next project. Also the study would help in modelling culture specific education programs for the masses regarding phases and types of CTs, conduct of CTs, risks and benefits involved in the trials, and participant’s rights while participating in CTs by understanding the importance of informed consent form.
This education would in turn help people make better Anacetrapib informed decisions and choices regarding participation in trials (it would be a self-initiated participation rather than an ??influenced?? participation). Awareness about CTs should reduce exploitation of TPs by Multinational Companies (MNCs). There were a number of limitations to this study. This study was not conducted on a random sample. This study was conducted in a particular location (Our sample was limited to one geographic area of the city) leading to a biased sample. Data was collected from few individuals so findings cannot be generalized to a larger population. The education level of the respondents was higher as compared to the general public. Despite these weaknesses, there are some strengths.
The response rate for the study was 100% offering opinions about clinical trials. This is one of the few selleck kinase inhibitor studies in India, where information has been gathered to understand awareness, perceptions and attitudes about clinical trials. The awareness of CTs was low even among fairly well educated respondents of our study. Considering that 70% of India’s population is rural, there is an urgent need to look at awareness of CTs.